International Journal of Health and Life Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

The Relationship Between Resource Management Learning Strategies and Academic Achievement

Masoumeh Vaezi 1 , Naser Hatamzadeh 2 , Fazel Zinat Motlagh 3 , Hooman Rahimi 4 , * and Motahereh Khalvandi 5
Authors Information
1 Faculty of Medicine, Kateb University, Kabul, Afghanistan
2 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IR Iran
3 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, IR Iran
4 Department of English language and Literature, Faculty of Language and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, IR Iran
5 Department of Applied Linguistics, Ilam University, Ilam, IR Iran
Article information
  • International Journal of Health and Life Sciences: January 2018, 4 (1); e79607
  • Published Online: June 25, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 20, 2018
  • Accepted: June 3, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijhls.79607

To Cite: Vaezi M, Hatamzadeh N, Zinat Motlagh F, Rahimi H, Khalvandi M. The Relationship Between Resource Management Learning Strategies and Academic Achievement, Int J Health Life Sci. 2018 ; 4(1):e79607. doi: 10.5812/ijhls.79607.

Copyright © 2018, International Journal of Health and Life Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
  • 1. Mazloomy Mahmodabad S, Hosseini P, Abbasi Shavazi M, Mirzaei-Alavijeh M, Rezaei F. A survey of Shahid Sadoughi university of medical sciences students' opinions about research barriers during university training. J Med Educ Dev. 2013;6(10):63-70.
  • 2. Hosseini SN, Mirzaei Alavijeh M, Karami Matin B, Hamzeh B, Ashtarian H, Jalilian F. Locus of Control or Self-Esteem; Which One is the Best Predictor of Academic Achievement in Iranian College Students. Iran J Psychiat Behav Sci. 2016;10(2). e2602. doi: 10.17795/ijpbs-2602.
  • 3. Hoffman B, Spatariu A. The influence of self-efficacy and metacognitive prompting on math problem-solving efficiency. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2008;33(4):875-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.002.
  • 4. Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT. Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013;14(1):4-58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266. [PubMed: 26173288].
  • 5. Jarvela S, Jarvenoja H. Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teach Col Rec. 2011;113(2):350-74.
  • 6. Wolters CA. Regulation of motivation: Contextual and social aspects. Teach Col Rec. 2011;113(2):265-83.
  • 7. Recker J, Reijers HA, van de Wouw SG. Process model comprehension: the effects of cognitive abilities, learning style, and strategy. Commun Assoc Inform Syst. 2014;34(9):199-222.
  • 8. Bermingham D, Hill RD, Woltz D, Gardner MK. Cognitive strategy use and measured numeric ability in immediate- and long-term recall of everyday numeric information. PLoS One. 2013;8(3). e57999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057999. [PubMed: 23483964]. [PubMed Central: PMC3590296].
  • 9. Schleifer LLF, Dull RB. Metacognition and Performance in the Accounting Classroom. Issues Account Educ. 2009;24(3):339-67. doi: 10.2308/iace.2009.24.3.339.
  • 10. Badeleh MT, Charkazi A, Asayesh HA, Hoseini SA. Study skills in Golestan University of Medical Sciences: A neglected need. Health Syst Res. 2012;8(4):643-9.
  • 11. Wolters CA. Regulation of Motivation: Evaluating an Underemphasized Aspect of Self-Regulated Learning. Educ Psychol. 2003;38(4):189-205. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3804_1.
  • 12. Kizilcec RF, Pérez-Sanagustín M, Maldonado JJ. Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Comput Educ. 2017;104:18-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001.
  • 13. Panchu P, Bahuleyan B, Seethalakshmi K, Thomas T. Evaluation of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among medical students. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2016;4(3):198. doi: 10.5455/jrmds.2016435.
  • 14. Broadbent J, Poon WL. Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. Internet High Educ. 2015;27:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007.
  • 15. Wei W. Can integrated skills tasks change students’ learning strategies and materials? Lang Learn J. 2017;45(3):336-51.
  • 16. Royanto LRM. The Effect of An Intervention Program based on Scaffolding to Improve Metacognitive Strategies in Reading: A Study of Year 3 Elementary School Students in Jakarta. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;69:1601-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.105.
  • 17. Sharaw H. The effects of gender of grade level on the motivational need of achievement. J Fam Consum Sci Educ. 2006;23(2):19-26.
  • 18. Pintrich PR. The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. Int J Educ Res. 1999;31(6):459-70. doi: 10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00015-4.
  • 19. Robbins SB, Lauver K, Le H, Davis D, Langley R, Carlstrom A. Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2004;130(2):261-88. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261. [PubMed: 14979772].
  • 20. Liem AD, Lau S, Nie Y. The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2008;33(4):486-512. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001.
  • 21. Donker AS, de Boer H, Kostons D, Dignath van Ewijk CC, van der Werf MPC. Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educ Res Rev. 2014;11:1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002.
  • 22. Pokay P, Blumenfeld PC. Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. J Educ Psychol. 1990;82(1):41.
  • 23. Ghiasvand MY. Relationship between learning strategies and academic achievement; based on information processing approach. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;5:1033-6. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.231.
  • 24. Filcher C, Miller G. Learning Strategies For Distance Eduation Students. J Agric Education. 2000;41(1):60-8. doi: 10.5032/jae.2000.01060.
  • 25. Elliot AJ, McGregor HA. A 2x2 achievement goal framework. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;80(3):501-19. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501.
  • 26. Jalilian F, Moazami P, Mirzaei-Alavijeh M, Moazami AM, Jalili C. Sensation Seeking and the Intention to Cheating among College Students: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Res J Appl Sci. 2016;11(8):645-9.
  • 27. Mirzaei-Alavijeh M, Matin BK, Hosseini SN, Jalilian F. Study Habits and Associated Demographic Determinants among Students of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Educ Res Med Sci J. 2017;6(1):19-24.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments